The stranger on the train.
Have you ever wondered why it's possible to have the deepest
and most profound conversation with someone you've only just
met. The man on the train. The woman on the plane.
It's often while travelling, and it happens rarely. But when
it does, it can be remarkable.You confide in each other to an amazing degree. It's somehow
easy for you to see one another's Big Picture.
Perhaps it's because you know you're unlikely to see one
another again. Maybe it's that you've got the other person's
undivided attention for quite a long, but finite time.
Whatever it is, there's something really powerful about this
idea of safely exchanging confidences with someone you don't
really know.
Written by Jon (Moodscope team), from a daily Moodscope e-mail dated July 14, 2010.
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Dear Stranger,
Monday, June 28, 2010
Menyeluruh
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Within
I always have the sense that the words are coming out of my body, not just my mind. (…) There’s something about the rhythms of language that correspond to the rhythms of our own bodies. An attentive reader is finding meanings in the book that can’t be articulated, finding them in his or her body. I think this is what so many people don’t understand about fiction. Poetry is supposed to be musical. But people don’t understand prose. They’re so used to reading journalism - clunky, functional sentences that convey factual information. Facts… just the surfaces of things.
Paul Auster, interviewed by Jonathan Lethem (the Believer Book of Writers talking to Writers)
Written by
Nadrah Mustafa
at
10:33
3
comments
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Romantisch I
When Romanticism bloomed in the late 18th century, young German scholars were driven over individualistic notion ever since the Renaissance. Kant was absorbed into their daily philosophies. Das Ding an sich. Or the Thing in itself. These fellow Romantics believed that the Ego, much like Freud's das Ich (the Ego) facilitate greatly in one's knowledge and cognition. They worshiped the Ego. They believed in the most romantic things like the Soul, yearning, imagination, feeling and experience. And believe me, they are beautiful, egocentric and romantic Souls!
But please do not confuse Romanticism with your modern chic literature rubbish.
So what these fellow Romantics (e.g. Beethoven, Goethe, Kant, Schiller, Byron, Coleridge) believed was that art has a deeper meaning to it. When one bridges the link between the external and internal worlds, a significant masterpiece of the internal world is being portrayed.
They were Souls who yearn for the most distant, abstract and metaphysical things. Not your usual face-value affections. They were in a search for something deeper than the seven seas. They believed in Perfection and completion. I dare to bet they'd take lines like Muse's Hysteria "Give me your Heart and your Soul" seriously.
Goethe, a romantic himself, introduced the concept of 'unrequited love' in his The Sorrows of Young Werther (1774).
So what happens when they do not achieve their perceived Perfection? Or when they do not attain their great Life component to Perfection and make them feel as a whole?
Friday, May 21, 2010
Integral.
You know what is wickedly right? The Clot (Read) or al-Alaq.
Written by
Nadrah Mustafa
at
21:34
3
comments
